<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Simple Weather</title>
	<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog</link>
	<description>Weather and forecast news from SimpleWeather.com</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Forecast rollover issues by bo jensen</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/forecast-rollover-issues/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>bo jensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/forecast-rollover-issues/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>www.msn.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msn.com" rel="nofollow">www.msn.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Hear You! by George</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/we-hear-you/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/we-hear-you/#comment-206</guid>
		<description>In the Pasadena, CA area, it has always been forecasting lower than weather.com... It seems to be very precise, if not accurate, always predicting about 8 degrees lower than weather.com. So I can just add that every time, and be happy! On the other hand, it's not like I actually check the temperature to see which is the closer prediction.

It would be interesting to see user feedback by location, though I don't know if enough people use this site yet for that to work well. If for example, enough people said that the temperatures were always off by a certain amount at a certain location, that offset could be taken into account in the prediction, or at least given as an alternate forecast. However, I suppose this defeats the purpose of "simple weather".

Wonderful, wonderful site. It doesn't give me a headache to look at!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Pasadena, CA area, it has always been forecasting lower than weather.com&#8230; It seems to be very precise, if not accurate, always predicting about 8 degrees lower than weather.com. So I can just add that every time, and be happy! On the other hand, it&#8217;s not like I actually check the temperature to see which is the closer prediction.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see user feedback by location, though I don&#8217;t know if enough people use this site yet for that to work well. If for example, enough people said that the temperatures were always off by a certain amount at a certain location, that offset could be taken into account in the prediction, or at least given as an alternate forecast. However, I suppose this defeats the purpose of &#8220;simple weather&#8221;.</p>
<p>Wonderful, wonderful site. It doesn&#8217;t give me a headache to look at!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on We Hear You! by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/we-hear-you/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/we-hear-you/#comment-205</guid>
		<description>simpleweather.com says it's going to be a high of 97 in my area.  weather.com says 84... I have a tendency to trust weather.com in this instance. :-/  Although I guess that's more of a CustomWeather issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simpleweather.com says it&#8217;s going to be a high of 97 in my area.  weather.com says 84&#8230; I have a tendency to trust weather.com in this instance. :-/  Although I guess that&#8217;s more of a CustomWeather issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Twitter Locations! by Stomatitis associated with lipitor.</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2007/new-twitter-locations/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Stomatitis associated with lipitor.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2007/new-twitter-locations/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Muscle loss due to lipitor....&lt;/strong&gt;

Generic lipitor. Lipitor and its bad effects. Generic version of lipitor. Lipitor side effects....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Muscle loss due to lipitor&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>Generic lipitor. Lipitor and its bad effects. Generic version of lipitor. Lipitor side effects&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Weather killed the dinosaurs! by salman</title>
		<link>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/weather-killed-the-dinosaurs/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>salman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 13:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.simpleweather.com/blog/2008/weather-killed-the-dinosaurs/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>cooolie ooooolie thats so coool!!$$ Send me more pretty pleeeeaaaaaase!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cooolie ooooolie thats so coool!!$$ Send me more pretty pleeeeaaaaaase!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
